Claude Code vs Devin
Detailed comparison of features, performance, and use cases
98/100
Claude Code
The industry-leading agentic coding tool that lives in your terminal, understands entire codebases, and autonomously executes complex multi-file development tasks with unmatched precision.
Quick Verdict
Claude Code excels at agentic coding and complex refactoring with a score of 98/100. Claude Code represents the pinnacle of agentic coding technology.
82/100
Devin
The world's first fully autonomous AI software engineer that can plan, code, debug, and deploy entire projects independently with minimal human intervention.
Quick Verdict
Devin excels at autonomous development and junior developer tasks with a score of 82/100. Devin pioneered the autonomous AI software engineer category, demonstrating that AI can independently complete complex development tasks from start to finish.
📊 Visual Score Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of key performance metrics across six evaluation criteria
Technical Specifications
| Feature | Claude Code | Devin |
|---|---|---|
| Core AI Model(s) | Claude Opus 4.5 (flagship, 80.9% SWE-bench), Claude Sonnet 4, Claude Haiku 3.5. Opus 4.5 outperformed all human engineering candidates on Anthropic's internal hiring tests. | Proprietary models optimized for autonomous coding with in-context reasoning capabilities. |
| Context Window | 200,000 tokens standard, with Sonnet-1M support. Agentic search understands entire project structures without manual file selection. Monorepo baseline ~20K tokens, leaving 180K for active development. | Large context with codebase analysis, pattern recognition, and code reuse detection. |
| Deployment Options | Terminal-native CLI via npm. Native VS Code and JetBrains IDE extensions. Headless mode for CI/CD and GitHub Actions. Enterprise deployment via AWS Bedrock or Google Cloud Vertex AI. | Cloud-based platform with web interface. Enterprise deployment options with VPC and SSO support. |
| Offline Mode | Cloud-based, requires internet. Designed for real-time agentic workflows. | Cloud-based only, requires internet connection for all operations. |
Core Features Comparison
Claude Code Features
- Agentic multi-file editing with autonomous planning and execution
- Industry-leading 200K token context window with full codebase understanding
- Native terminal integration with any IDE or editor
- Git workflow automation with PR creation and code review
- Model Context Protocol (MCP) for external tool integration
- Subagent architecture for complex task decomposition
- CLAUDE.md project memory for persistent context
Devin Features
- Fully autonomous end-to-end software development
- Interactive planning with collaborative task scoping
- Multi-Devin parallel task execution
- Cloud-based IDE with VSCode-style interface
- Devin Wiki for auto-generated documentation
- Voice command integration for hands-free coding
- Git integration with PR creation and code review
Pricing & Value Analysis
| Aspect | Claude Code | Devin |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing URL | View Claude Code Pricing | View Devin Pricing |
| Overall Score | 98/100 | 82/100 |
| Best For | Agentic Coding, Complex Refactoring, Multi-File Development, Code Architecture, Autonomous Task Execution | Autonomous Development, Junior Developer Tasks, Parallel Task Execution, Enterprise Automation, Code Migration |
Best Use Cases
Claude Code Excels At
- Autonomous feature implementation: describe functionality in natural language and Claude Code plans, implements across multiple files, runs tests, and creates PRs
- Large-scale codebase refactoring with full context awareness—maintains consistency across hundreds of files without losing context
- Legacy code modernization by analyzing entire codebases and executing systematic upgrades with rollback capabilities
- CI/CD integration via headless mode for automated code review, testing, and deployment workflows
- Complex debugging: paste an error, and Claude Code analyzes the codebase, identifies root causes, and implements verified fixes
Devin Excels At
- Autonomous feature implementation from natural language descriptions—Devin plans, codes, tests, and deploys with minimal oversight
- Code migration projects like Ember to React or Ruby to Kotlin, handling large-scale rewrites autonomously
- Parallel task execution by spinning up multiple Devin instances to tackle different features simultaneously
- Junior developer task automation for bug fixes, documentation, and routine maintenance work
Performance & Integration
| Category | Claude Code | Devin | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| IDE Support | Terminal-native (works with ANY editor), plus native extensions for VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, and JetBrains IDEs. | Cloud-based VSCode-style IDE accessible via browser. No local installation required. | Tie |
| Community | Active community | Active community | Tie |
| Data Richness | Comprehensive | Comprehensive | Tie |
| Overall Score | 98/100 | 82/100 | Claude Code |
The Bottom Line
Both Claude Code and Devin are capable AI coding tools, but they serve different needs. Claude Code scores higher (98/100 vs 82/100) and excels in agentic coding and complex refactoring. The choice depends on your specific workflow, team size, and technical requirements.
Choose Claude Code if: you prioritize agentic coding and complex refactoring and want the higher-rated option (98/100).
Choose Devin if: you prioritize autonomous development and junior developer tasks and don't mind a slightly lower score for specialized features.