Cursor vs Google Antigravity
Cursor
Quick Verdict
Cursor excels at ai-native development and code refactoring with a score of 95/100. Cursor represents the future of coding environments, built specifically for AI-powered development.
Google Antigravity
Quick Verdict
Google Antigravity excels at agentic workflows and ai-native development with a score of 91/100. Google Antigravity represents a paradigm shift in AI-assisted development, moving beyond code completion to full agentic automation.
đ Visual Score Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of key performance metrics across six evaluation criteria
Technical Specifications
| Feature | Cursor | Google Antigravity |
|---|---|---|
| Core AI Model(s) | Supports frontier models including Claude Sonnet 4, OpenAI o3-pro, OpenAI GPT-4.1, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and Claude Opus 4. It also utilizes custom, purpose-built models for features like its native autocomplete, 'Tab'. | Powered by Google's Gemini 3 Pro model as default, with support for Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 4.5 and OpenAI's GPT-OSS for flexible model selection. |
| Context Window | The Pro plan provides access to maximum context windows. | Supports large context windows through Gemini 3 Pro's advanced architecture, with multimodal processing of code, images, and design mocks. |
| Deployment Options | Cursor is a downloadable desktop application for macOS, Windows, and Linux. For teams, it offers an Enterprise plan with SAML/OIDC SSO and SCIM seat management for centralized administration. | Available as a downloadable desktop application for Windows, macOS, and Linux. Currently in public preview with enterprise features planned. |
| Offline Mode | Cursor has offline capabilities. A GitHub repository provides a guide for offline activation, enabling all features to work without a cloud or login requirement in airgapped systems. However, some users have reported difficulty using agent mode specifically in an offline setting. | Limited offline capabilities; core agentic features require cloud connectivity for AI model inference and agent orchestration. |
Core Features Comparison
Cursor Features
- AI-powered code completion and generation
- Multi-file code editing with AI chat
- Advanced code understanding and refactoring
- Integrated terminal and debugging tools
Google Antigravity Features
- Agentic development with autonomous AI agents
- Dual interface: Editor View and Manager View
- Artifact transparency system for trust verification
- Multimodal capabilities (code, images, design mocks)
- Multi-model support (Gemini 3 Pro, Claude Sonnet 4.5, GPT-OSS)
- Self-improvement mechanism learning from user feedback
Pricing & Value Analysis
| Aspect | Cursor | Google Antigravity |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing URL | View Cursor Pricing | View Google Antigravity Pricing |
| Overall Score | 95/100 | 91/100 |
| Best For | AI-Native Development, Code Refactoring, Multi-file Projects | Agentic Workflows, AI-Native Development, Multi-Agent Orchestration |
Best Use Cases
Cursor Excels At
- Large-scale refactoring across multiple files with AI understanding the full codebase context
- Building complex features by describing functionality in natural language and letting AI generate the implementation
- Code reviews and debugging with AI analyzing relationships between files and suggesting improvements
Google Antigravity Excels At
- Orchestrating multiple AI agents to work on different parts of a large codebase simultaneously
- End-to-end feature development from design mocks to implementation using multimodal AI
- Complex refactoring tasks with autonomous planning, execution, and validation by AI agents
Performance & Integration
| Category | Cursor | Google Antigravity | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| IDE Support | Cursor is a standalone code editor that is a fork of VS Code. This allows users to import their existing VS Code extensions, themes, and keybindings with a single click. | Google Antigravity is a standalone AI-native IDE. Integrates with Google Cloud services and supports extensions. | Tie |
| Community | Active community | Active community | Tie |
| Data Richness | Comprehensive | Comprehensive | Tie |
| Overall Score | 95/100 | 91/100 | Cursor |
The Bottom Line
Both Cursor and Google Antigravity are capable AI coding tools, but they serve different needs. Cursor scores higher (95/100 vs 91/100) and excels in ai-native development and code refactoring. The choice depends on your specific workflow, team size, and technical requirements.
Choose Cursor if: you prioritize ai-native development and code refactoring and want the higher-rated option (95/100).
Choose Google Antigravity if: you prioritize agentic workflows and ai-native development and don't mind a slightly lower score for specialized features.