Cursor vs Qodo (formerly Codium)
Detailed comparison of features, performance, and use cases
95/100
Cursor
An AI-powered code editor built from the ground up for AI programming, offering advanced AI features with a VS Code-like interface.
Quick Verdict
Cursor excels at ai-native development and code refactoring with a score of 95/100. Cursor represents the future of coding environments, built specifically for AI-powered development.
82/100
Qodo (formerly Codium)
AI-powered test generation and code analysis tool.
Quick Verdict
Qodo (formerly Codium) excels at test generation and code quality with a score of 82/100. CodiumAI (now also known as Qodo) fills a crucial gap in AI coding tools by focusing on testing.
Technical Specifications
| Feature | Cursor | Qodo (formerly Codium) |
|---|---|---|
| Core AI Model(s) | Supports frontier models including Claude Sonnet 4, OpenAI o3-pro, OpenAI GPT-4.1, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and Claude Opus 4. It also utilizes custom, purpose-built models for features like its native autocomplete, 'Tab'. | Qodo uses a combination of its own proprietary, fine-tuned models (such as TestGPT and embedding models for code) and allows users to select from leading third-party models, including OpenAI's GPT series, Anthropic's Claude models, and Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro. |
| Context Window | The Pro plan provides access to maximum context windows. | Qodo is context-aware, utilizing Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and a codebase intelligence engine to index and understand an organization's entire codebase across multiple repositories for more accurate and tailored suggestions. |
| Deployment Options | Cursor is a downloadable desktop application for macOS, Windows, and Linux. For teams, it offers an Enterprise plan with SAML/OIDC SSO and SCIM seat management for centralized administration. | Qodo offers a multi-tenant SaaS solution for its free and team plans. The Enterprise plan provides flexible deployment options, including single-tenant SaaS, a private cloud (VPC), and fully on-premise or air-gapped environments. |
| Offline Mode | Cursor has offline capabilities. A GitHub repository provides a guide for offline activation, enabling all features to work without a cloud or login requirement in airgapped systems. However, some users have reported difficulty using agent mode specifically in an offline setting. | Partially. While most advanced features require an internet connection, some basic functions like code completion can work offline. Full offline capability is available through the on-premise and air-gapped enterprise deployments. |
Core Features Comparison
Cursor Features
- AI-powered code completion and generation
- Multi-file code editing with AI chat
- Advanced code understanding and refactoring
- Integrated terminal and debugging tools
Qodo (formerly Codium) Features
- Automatic test suite generation
- Code behavior analysis and documentation
- Integration with popular testing frameworks
- Pull request analysis and suggestions
Pricing & Value Analysis
| Aspect | Cursor | Qodo (formerly Codium) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing URL | View Cursor Pricing | View Qodo (formerly Codium) Pricing |
| Overall Score | 95/100 | 82/100 |
| Best For | AI-Native Development, Code Refactoring, Multi-file Projects | Test Generation, Code Quality, Test Coverage |
Best Use Cases
Cursor Excels At
- Large-scale refactoring across multiple files with AI understanding the full codebase context
- Building complex features by describing functionality in natural language and letting AI generate the implementation
- Code reviews and debugging with AI analyzing relationships between files and suggesting improvements
Qodo (formerly Codium) Excels At
- Automated unit and integration test generation with intelligent edge case detection
- Code behavior analysis and documentation for improving code quality and maintainability
- Pull request analysis with AI-powered suggestions for test coverage improvements
Performance & Integration
| Category | Cursor | Qodo (formerly Codium) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| IDE Support | Cursor is a standalone code editor that is a fork of VS Code. This allows users to import their existing VS Code extensions, themes, and keybindings with a single click. | Qodo provides official extensions for VS Code and the entire suite of JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ, PyCharm, etc.). | Tie |
| Community | Active community | Active community | Tie |
| Data Richness | Comprehensive | Comprehensive | Tie |
| Overall Score | 95/100 | 82/100 | Cursor |
The Bottom Line
Both Cursor and Qodo (formerly Codium) are capable AI coding tools, but they serve different needs. Cursor scores higher (95/100 vs 82/100) and excels in ai-native development and code refactoring. The choice depends on your specific workflow, team size, and technical requirements.
Choose Cursor if: you prioritize ai-native development and code refactoring and want the higher-rated option (95/100).
Choose Qodo (formerly Codium) if: you prioritize test generation and code quality and don't mind a slightly lower score for specialized features.