Last updated: 2025-12-29

GitHub Copilot vs Windsurf

Detailed comparison of features, performance, and use cases
94/100

GitHub Copilot

The pioneering AI pair programmer with the widest IDE support and deepest GitHub ecosystem integration, optimized for rapid inline code completion and suggestions.
Code CompletionSpeed & RepetitionIDE IntegrationGitHub Workflow Integration

Quick Verdict

GitHub Copilot excels at code completion and speed & repetition with a score of 94/100. GitHub Copilot pioneered AI-assisted coding and remains unbeatable for speed and seamless IDE integration with 82% enterprise adoption and 88% suggestion retention rate.

91/100

Windsurf

An AI-powered code editor focused on agentic workflows, multi-file editing, and in-editor refactoring.
AI-Native DevelopmentLarge CodebasesAgentic Workflows

Quick Verdict

Windsurf excels at ai-native development and large codebases with a score of 91/100. Windsurf competes in the Cursor-class editor category with an emphasis on agentic workflows.

📊 Visual Score Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of key performance metrics across six evaluation criteria

Technical Specifications

Feature GitHub Copilot Windsurf
Core AI Model(s) Powered by a variety of generative AI models from GitHub, OpenAI, and Microsoft. Specific models available depend on the user's plan, including Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4.1 (Free), Claude 3.7/4 Sonnet, Gemini 2.5 Pro (Pro), and Claude Opus 4, o3 (Pro+). Not specified
Context Window Context is derived from the code within your editor, focusing on the lines immediately surrounding your cursor, other open files in your workspace, and the URLs of relevant repositories or file paths to provide relevant suggestions. Not specified
Deployment Options Available as an extension for major IDEs including Visual Studio Code, Visual Studio, Neovim, Xcode, Eclipse, and the JetBrains suite. It also integrates with the GitHub CLI, GitHub Mobile, and directly into the GitHub.com interface for Enterprise users. Not specified
Offline Mode No, GitHub Copilot requires a constant internet connection to function. It sends code snippets and context to GitHub's cloud servers for processing and cannot generate suggestions while offline. Not specified

Core Features Comparison

GitHub Copilot Features

  • Real-time code suggestions and completions
  • Context-aware code generation
  • Support for dozens of programming languages
  • Integration with popular IDEs and editors
  • Agent mode for iterative development
  • Coding agent for async PR generation

Windsurf Features

  • Agentic workflows for multi-step tasks
  • Context-aware code completion and refactoring
  • Multi-file edits and project-wide reasoning
  • Native editor experience with low-latency responses

Pricing & Value Analysis

Aspect GitHub Copilot Windsurf
Pricing URL View GitHub Copilot Pricing View Windsurf Pricing
Overall Score 94/100 91/100
Best For Code Completion, Speed & Repetition, IDE Integration, GitHub Workflow Integration AI-Native Development, Large Codebases, Agentic Workflows

Best Use Cases

GitHub Copilot Excels At

  • Writing boilerplate code and repetitive functions with intelligent autocomplete suggestions
  • Learning new programming languages and frameworks by getting contextual code examples
  • Accelerating API integration by generating code based on documentation and existing patterns

Windsurf Excels At

  • Multi-file feature development with agent-guided refactors
  • Complex codebase changes coordinated across modules
  • Rapid iteration with in-editor AI for generation and fixes

Performance & Integration

Category GitHub Copilot Windsurf Winner
IDE Support Visual Studio Code, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Neovim, Xcode, Eclipse, Azure Data Studio. Multiple IDEs supported Tie
Community Active community Limited community Tie
Data Richness Comprehensive Basic GitHub Copilot
Overall Score 94/100 91/100 GitHub Copilot

The Bottom Line

Both GitHub Copilot and Windsurf are capable AI coding tools, but they serve different needs. GitHub Copilot scores higher (94/100 vs 91/100) and excels in code completion and speed & repetition. The choice depends on your specific workflow, team size, and technical requirements.

Choose GitHub Copilot if: you prioritize code completion and speed & repetition and want the higher-rated option (94/100).

Choose Windsurf if: you prioritize ai-native development and large codebases and don't mind a slightly lower score for specialized features.