Google Antigravity vs Sourcegraph Cody
Google Antigravity is best for Agentic Workflows, while Sourcegraph Cody targets Enterprise Codebases. On our independent 100-point evaluation, Google Antigravity scores 92/100 vs Sourcegraph Cody's 86/100 â a 6-point gap reflecting measurable differences across ten capability dimensions.
Google Antigravity
Quick Verdict
Google Antigravity focuses on Agentic Workflows and AI-Native Development and scores 92/100 in our independent evaluation. Google Antigravity represents a paradigm shift in AI-assisted development, moving beyond code completion to full agentic automation.
Sourcegraph Cody
Quick Verdict
Sourcegraph Cody focuses on Enterprise Codebases and Code Search and scores 86/100 in our independent evaluation. Cody excels at understanding large, complex codebases across multiple repositories.
đ Visual Score Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of key performance metrics across six evaluation criteria
Technical Specifications
| Feature | Google Antigravity | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Core AI Model(s) | Powered by Google's Gemini 3 Pro model as default, with support for Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 4.5 and OpenAI's GPT-OSS for flexible model selection. | Not specified |
| Context Window | Supports large context windows through Gemini 3 Pro's advanced architecture, with multimodal processing of code, images, and design mocks. | Not specified |
| Deployment Options | Available as a downloadable desktop application for Windows, macOS, and Linux. Currently in public preview with enterprise features planned. | Not specified |
| Offline Mode | Limited offline capabilities; core agentic features require cloud connectivity for AI model inference and agent orchestration. | Not specified |
Core Features Comparison
Google Antigravity Features
- Agentic development with autonomous AI agents
- Dual interface: Editor View and Manager View
- Artifact transparency system for trust verification
- Multimodal capabilities (code, images, design mocks)
- Multi-model support (Gemini 3 Pro, Claude Sonnet 4.5, GPT-OSS)
- Self-improvement mechanism learning from user feedback
Sourcegraph Cody Features
- Deep codebase context and understanding
- AI-powered code search and navigation
- Multi-repository code intelligence
- Enterprise-grade security and deployment options
Pricing & Value Analysis
| Aspect | Google Antigravity | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Entry Price | See pricing page | Free â Was: Basic code search |
| Pro Tier | â | Discontinued(as of July 2025) Pro |
| Overall Score | 92/100 | 86/100 |
| Best For | Agentic Workflows, AI-Native Development, Multi-Agent Orchestration | Enterprise Codebases, Code Search, Large-scale Projects |
| Detailed Pricing | View Google Antigravity pricing | View Sourcegraph Cody pricing |
Best Use Cases
Google Antigravity Excels At
- Orchestrating multiple AI agents to work on different parts of a large codebase simultaneously
- End-to-end feature development from design mocks to implementation using multimodal AI
- Complex refactoring tasks with autonomous planning, execution, and validation by AI agents
Sourcegraph Cody Excels At
- Enterprise codebase navigation and understanding across multiple repositories and microservices
- Technical support and troubleshooting by analyzing complex codebases and providing contextual solutions
- Code modernization and migration projects with deep understanding of legacy system dependencies
Performance & Integration
| Category | Google Antigravity | Sourcegraph Cody | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 92/100 | 86/100 | Google Antigravity |
| Community Channels | 2 channels | 0 channels | Google Antigravity |
The Bottom Line
Google Antigravity and Sourcegraph Cody each serve different needs. Google Antigravity scores higher (92/100 vs 86/100) and tends to excel in Agentic Workflows and AI-Native Development. The right pick depends on your workflow, team size, and technical constraints.
Choose Google Antigravity if: you prioritize Agentic Workflows and AI-Native Development and want the higher-rated option (92/100 vs 86/100).
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if: you prioritize Enterprise Codebases and Code Search and accept a slightly lower headline score for its specialized fit.
Get the full comparison wallchart â scores, features, and decision guide in one printable PDF.
Get your project online with trusted hosting and domain providers.