Last updated: 2025-08-10

JetBrains AI Assistant vs Sourcegraph Cody

Detailed comparison of features, performance, and use cases
90/100

JetBrains AI Assistant

Integrated AI coding assistant built into JetBrains IDEs, offering context-aware suggestions and explanations.
JetBrains IDE UsersEnterprise DevelopmentCode Refactoring

Quick Verdict

JetBrains AI Assistant excels at jetbrains ide users and enterprise development with a score of 90/100. JetBrains AI Assistant leverages the deep IDE integration and powerful static analysis capabilities of JetBrains tools.

89/100

Sourcegraph Cody

AI coding assistant with deep codebase understanding and powerful code search capabilities.
Enterprise CodebasesCode SearchLarge-scale Projects

Quick Verdict

Sourcegraph Cody excels at enterprise codebases and code search with a score of 89/100. Cody excels at understanding large, complex codebases across multiple repositories.

Technical Specifications

Feature JetBrains AI Assistant Sourcegraph Cody
Core AI Model(s) JetBrains AI Assistant uses a combination of models. It leverages its own proprietary LLM, Mellum, which is optimized for coding. It also provides access to third-party cloud models from providers like OpenAI, Google (Gemini 2.5 Pro), and Anthropic (Claude 3.7 Sonnet). Not specified
Context Window The assistant is deeply integrated into the IDE and is context-aware, using information from the current project, including language versions, libraries, and related files, to generate more accurate prompts and suggestions. Not specified
Deployment Options The AI Assistant is available as a plugin within JetBrains' commercial IDEs. For enterprise customers with strict data privacy needs, an on-premises solution is available through IDE Services, which can run in an air-gapped environment using local models like Llama 3.1 via Hugging Face. Not specified
Offline Mode Yes, JetBrains AI Assistant supports an offline mode. Users can connect to locally hosted models through tools like Ollama or LM Studio, allowing most AI features to function without an internet connection. However, some advanced features like multi-file edits are not available in offline mode. Not specified

Core Features Comparison

JetBrains AI Assistant Features

  • Context-aware code completion within JetBrains IDEs
  • Code explanation and documentation generation
  • Refactoring suggestions based on best practices
  • Integration with JetBrains' powerful development tools

Sourcegraph Cody Features

  • Deep codebase context and understanding
  • AI-powered code search and navigation
  • Multi-repository code intelligence
  • Enterprise-grade security and deployment options

Pricing & Value Analysis

Aspect JetBrains AI Assistant Sourcegraph Cody
Pricing URL View JetBrains AI Assistant Pricing View Sourcegraph Cody Pricing
Overall Score 90/100 89/100
Best For JetBrains IDE Users, Enterprise Development, Code Refactoring Enterprise Codebases, Code Search, Large-scale Projects

Best Use Cases

JetBrains AI Assistant Excels At

  • Automated commit message generation based on code changes and project context
  • Complex refactoring operations with AI understanding of code dependencies and design patterns
  • Code explanation and documentation for team knowledge sharing and onboarding new developers

Sourcegraph Cody Excels At

  • Enterprise codebase navigation and understanding across multiple repositories and microservices
  • Technical support and troubleshooting by analyzing complex codebases and providing contextual solutions
  • Code modernization and migration projects with deep understanding of legacy system dependencies

Performance & Integration

Category JetBrains AI Assistant Sourcegraph Cody Winner
IDE Support Fully integrated with the suite of JetBrains IDEs, including IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, CLion, ReSharper, and others. Multiple IDEs supported Tie
Community Active community Limited community Tie
Data Richness Comprehensive Basic JetBrains AI Assistant
Overall Score 90/100 89/100 JetBrains AI Assistant

The Bottom Line

Both JetBrains AI Assistant and Sourcegraph Cody are capable AI coding tools, but they serve different needs. JetBrains AI Assistant scores higher (90/100 vs 89/100) and excels in jetbrains ide users and enterprise development. The choice depends on your specific workflow, team size, and technical requirements.

Choose JetBrains AI Assistant if: you prioritize jetbrains ide users and enterprise development and want the higher-rated option (90/100).

Choose Sourcegraph Cody if: you prioritize enterprise codebases and code search and don't mind a slightly lower score for specialized features.