Sourcegraph Cody vs Gemini CLI
Sourcegraph Cody
Quick Verdict
Sourcegraph Cody excels at enterprise codebases and code search with a score of 89/100. Cody excels at understanding large, complex codebases across multiple repositories.
Gemini CLI
Quick Verdict
Gemini CLI excels at terminal-first workflows and free ai coding with a score of 86/100. Gemini CLI democratizes AI-assisted terminal workflows with a generous free tier that rivals paid alternatives.
📊 Visual Score Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of key performance metrics across six evaluation criteria
Technical Specifications
| Feature | Sourcegraph Cody | Gemini CLI |
|---|---|---|
| Core AI Model(s) | Not specified | Gemini 3 Pro (most intelligent, 1M context), Gemini 3 Flash (fast, 78% SWE-bench). Configurable model selection. |
| Context Window | Not specified | 1M tokens with Gemini 3 Pro for massive codebase understanding. |
| Deployment Options | Not specified | npm install -g @google/gemini-cli. Open-source for self-hosting and modification. |
| Offline Mode | Not specified | Cloud-based, requires internet for model inference. Local tools can execute offline. |
Core Features Comparison
Sourcegraph Cody Features
- Deep codebase context and understanding
- AI-powered code search and navigation
- Multi-repository code intelligence
- Enterprise-grade security and deployment options
Gemini CLI Features
- Free tier: 60 requests/min, 1000 requests/day with personal Google account
- Gemini 3 Pro and Flash models with 1M token context
- Built-in tools: Google Search grounding, file ops, shell commands, web fetch
- MCP (Model Context Protocol) for custom integrations
- ReAct loop for complex multi-step reasoning
- Open-source under Apache 2.0 license
- VS Code Gemini Code Assist integration
Pricing & Value Analysis
| Aspect | Sourcegraph Cody | Gemini CLI |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing URL | View Sourcegraph Cody Pricing | View Gemini CLI Pricing |
| Overall Score | 89/100 | 86/100 |
| Best For | Enterprise Codebases, Code Search, Large-scale Projects | Terminal-First Workflows, Free AI Coding, Google Ecosystem Integration, Extensible Automation, Large Context Tasks |
Best Use Cases
Sourcegraph Cody Excels At
- Enterprise codebase navigation and understanding across multiple repositories and microservices
- Technical support and troubleshooting by analyzing complex codebases and providing contextual solutions
- Code modernization and migration projects with deep understanding of legacy system dependencies
Gemini CLI Excels At
- Free AI coding assistance with generous rate limits for individual developers and small teams
- Large codebase understanding with 1M token context—analyze entire repositories without truncation
- Extensible automation by connecting Figma, Stripe, Datadog, and other tools via MCP integrations
Performance & Integration
| Category | Sourcegraph Cody | Gemini CLI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| IDE Support | Multiple IDEs supported | Terminal-native, IDE-agnostic. VS Code integration via Gemini Code Assist. | Tie |
| Community | Limited community | Active community | Tie |
| Data Richness | Basic | Comprehensive | Gemini CLI |
| Overall Score | 89/100 | 86/100 | Sourcegraph Cody |
The Bottom Line
Both Sourcegraph Cody and Gemini CLI are capable AI coding tools, but they serve different needs. Sourcegraph Cody scores higher (89/100 vs 86/100) and excels in enterprise codebases and code search. The choice depends on your specific workflow, team size, and technical requirements.
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if: you prioritize enterprise codebases and code search and want the higher-rated option (89/100).
Choose Gemini CLI if: you prioritize terminal-first workflows and free ai coding and don't mind a slightly lower score for specialized features.