Sourcegraph Cody vs Phind
Sourcegraph Cody
Quick Verdict
Sourcegraph Cody excels at enterprise codebases and code search with a score of 89/100. Cody excels at understanding large, complex codebases across multiple repositories.
Phind
Quick Verdict
Phind excels at ai-powered search and technical research with a score of 81/100. Phind is an AI-powered search engine tailored for developers.
📊 Visual Score Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of key performance metrics across six evaluation criteria
Technical Specifications
| Feature | Sourcegraph Cody | Phind |
|---|---|---|
| Core AI Model(s) | Not specified | Phind uses its own proprietary models, such as Phind-70B, which is a fine-tuned version of CodeLlama-70B. For subscribers, Phind also provides access to third-party models like GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. |
| Context Window | Not specified | The proprietary Phind model supports a context window of up to 32K tokens. On the website, inputs of up to 12k tokens are allowed, with the remainder reserved for web search results. |
| Deployment Options | Not specified | Phind is a cloud-based web application and does not offer on-premise deployment options. |
| Offline Mode | Not specified | No, Phind requires a constant internet connection to function as it is an AI search engine that pulls real-time information from the web. |
Core Features Comparison
Sourcegraph Cody Features
- Deep codebase context and understanding
- AI-powered code search and navigation
- Multi-repository code intelligence
- Enterprise-grade security and deployment options
Phind Features
- Answers technical questions using real-time information from the internet.
- Developer-focused search with code examples
- Integration of multiple sources and documentation
- Pair programmer mode helps you build out features step-by-step.
- Personalized answers based on your preferences and tech stack.
- VS Code extension for in-editor search
Pricing & Value Analysis
| Aspect | Sourcegraph Cody | Phind |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing URL | View Sourcegraph Cody Pricing | View Phind Pricing |
| Overall Score | 89/100 | 81/100 |
| Best For | Enterprise Codebases, Code Search, Large-scale Projects | AI-Powered Search, Technical Research, Learning New Technologies |
Best Use Cases
Sourcegraph Cody Excels At
- Enterprise codebase navigation and understanding across multiple repositories and microservices
- Technical support and troubleshooting by analyzing complex codebases and providing contextual solutions
- Code modernization and migration projects with deep understanding of legacy system dependencies
Phind Excels At
- Quickly finding solutions to common programming problems by searching across multiple sources
- Learning new programming concepts and libraries by exploring example code and documentation
- Researching complex technical topics and gathering information for documentation or code examples
Performance & Integration
| Category | Sourcegraph Cody | Phind | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| IDE Support | Multiple IDEs supported | Phind offers an official extension for Visual Studio Code. | Tie |
| Community | Limited community | Active community | Tie |
| Data Richness | Basic | Comprehensive | Phind |
| Overall Score | 89/100 | 81/100 | Sourcegraph Cody |
The Bottom Line
Both Sourcegraph Cody and Phind are capable AI coding tools, but they serve different needs. Sourcegraph Cody scores higher (89/100 vs 81/100) and excels in enterprise codebases and code search. The choice depends on your specific workflow, team size, and technical requirements.
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if: you prioritize enterprise codebases and code search and want the higher-rated option (89/100).
Choose Phind if: you prioritize ai-powered search and technical research and don't mind a slightly lower score for specialized features.