Tabnine vs Kiro
Tabnine
Quick Verdict
Tabnine excels at code completion and privacy-conscious development with a score of 86/100. Tabnine stands out for its privacy-first approach and highly personalized AI suggestions.
Kiro
Quick Verdict
Kiro excels at agentic workflows and spec-driven development with a score of 85/100. Kiro represents AWS's strategic entry into agentic coding, differentiated by its unique spec-driven development approach.
📊 Visual Score Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of key performance metrics across six evaluation criteria
Technical Specifications
| Feature | Tabnine | Kiro |
|---|---|---|
| Core AI Model(s) | Tabnine uses its own proprietary, private AI models for code completion and chat. It also allows users to switch to third-party models from providers like Anthropic (Claude), OpenAI (GPT), Cohere, and Mistral. | Claude Sonnet 4.5 as primary model, with Auto mode that combines frontier models with prompt caching to optimize quality, latency, and cost. |
| Context Window | Tabnine is context-aware, analyzing your local IDE environment and project files to provide relevant suggestions. The Enterprise plan allows connecting to an organization's entire codebase (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket) for more deeply personalized, context-aware recommendations. | Large context support through Claude Sonnet 4.5. Persistent context across sessions enables multi-day autonomous work without losing project understanding. |
| Deployment Options | Tabnine offers flexible deployment. It is available as a secure multi-tenant SaaS for all users. For Enterprise customers, it offers fully private deployments on-premises, in a Virtual Private Cloud (VPC), or in a completely air-gapped environment. | Standalone IDE (Code OSS-based) for macOS, Windows, Linux. CLI available for macOS and Linux. No AWS account required—sign in with GitHub, Google, AWS Builder ID, or IAM Identity Center. |
| Offline Mode | Yes, Tabnine's AI can run locally on a developer's machine, on a server behind a firewall, or in the cloud, supporting offline use cases. | Cloud-based, requires internet connection. Core agentic features depend on cloud AI inference. |
Core Features Comparison
Tabnine Features
- Personalized AI code completion
- Privacy-focused local processing
- Support for multiple programming languages
- Custom model training on your codebase
Kiro Features
- Spec-driven development with auto-generated requirements.md, design.md, and tasks.md
- Autonomous agent that works for hours/days with persistent context
- Kiro Powers for dynamic context activation (Stripe, Figma, Datadog)
- Property-based testing (PBT) to verify code matches specifications
- Native MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration
- Agent hooks for automated documentation and testing on file events
- Multimodal chat supporting images and UI designs
- Agent steering files for project-specific customization
Pricing & Value Analysis
| Aspect | Tabnine | Kiro |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing URL | View Tabnine Pricing | View Kiro Pricing |
| Overall Score | 86/100 | 85/100 |
| Best For | Code Completion, Privacy-conscious Development, Personalized AI | Agentic Workflows, Spec-Driven Development, Enterprise Development, AWS Integration, Long-Running Tasks |
Best Use Cases
Tabnine Excels At
- Personalized code completion that learns from your team's coding patterns and maintains consistency across projects
- Privacy-compliant AI assistance for enterprises with strict data security requirements and air-gapped environments
- Custom AI model training on proprietary codebases for domain-specific programming languages and frameworks
Kiro Excels At
- Converting product requirements into structured specs and implementation plans before writing any code—ensuring alignment between stakeholders and developers
- Running autonomous agents on complex features overnight, returning to completed implementations with full audit trails of decisions made
- Enterprise development where compliance requires traceable specifications that map directly to generated code artifacts
Performance & Integration
| Category | Tabnine | Kiro | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| IDE Support | Tabnine supports a wide range of IDEs, including VS Code, the JetBrains suite (IntelliJ, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), Visual Studio, Eclipse, and Neovim. | Kiro is a standalone IDE based on Code OSS. Supports VS Code settings import, Open VSX extensions, and existing themes. CLI available for terminal workflows. | Tie |
| Community | Active community | Active community | Tie |
| Data Richness | Comprehensive | Comprehensive | Tie |
| Overall Score | 86/100 | 85/100 | Tabnine |
The Bottom Line
Both Tabnine and Kiro are capable AI coding tools, but they serve different needs. Tabnine scores higher (86/100 vs 85/100) and excels in code completion and privacy-conscious development. The choice depends on your specific workflow, team size, and technical requirements.
Choose Tabnine if: you prioritize code completion and privacy-conscious development and want the higher-rated option (86/100).
Choose Kiro if: you prioritize agentic workflows and spec-driven development and don't mind a slightly lower score for specialized features.