Windsurf vs Qodo (formerly Codium)
Windsurf
Quick Verdict
Windsurf excels at ai-native development and large codebases with a score of 91/100. Windsurf competes in the Cursor-class editor category with an emphasis on agentic workflows.
Qodo (formerly Codium)
Quick Verdict
Qodo (formerly Codium) excels at test generation and code quality with a score of 82/100. CodiumAI (now also known as Qodo) fills a crucial gap in AI coding tools by focusing on testing.
Technical Specifications
| Feature | Windsurf | Qodo (formerly Codium) |
|---|---|---|
| Core AI Model(s) | Not specified | Qodo uses a combination of its own proprietary, fine-tuned models (such as TestGPT and embedding models for code) and allows users to select from leading third-party models, including OpenAI's GPT series, Anthropic's Claude models, and Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro. |
| Context Window | Not specified | Qodo is context-aware, utilizing Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and a codebase intelligence engine to index and understand an organization's entire codebase across multiple repositories for more accurate and tailored suggestions. |
| Deployment Options | Not specified | Qodo offers a multi-tenant SaaS solution for its free and team plans. The Enterprise plan provides flexible deployment options, including single-tenant SaaS, a private cloud (VPC), and fully on-premise or air-gapped environments. |
| Offline Mode | Not specified | Partially. While most advanced features require an internet connection, some basic functions like code completion can work offline. Full offline capability is available through the on-premise and air-gapped enterprise deployments. |
Core Features Comparison
Windsurf Features
- Agentic workflows for multi-step tasks
- Context-aware code completion and refactoring
- Multi-file edits and project-wide reasoning
- Native editor experience with low-latency responses
Qodo (formerly Codium) Features
- Automatic test suite generation
- Code behavior analysis and documentation
- Integration with popular testing frameworks
- Pull request analysis and suggestions
Pricing & Value Analysis
| Aspect | Windsurf | Qodo (formerly Codium) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing URL | View Windsurf Pricing | View Qodo (formerly Codium) Pricing |
| Overall Score | 91/100 | 82/100 |
| Best For | AI-Native Development, Large Codebases, Agentic Workflows | Test Generation, Code Quality, Test Coverage |
Best Use Cases
Windsurf Excels At
- Multi-file feature development with agent-guided refactors
- Complex codebase changes coordinated across modules
- Rapid iteration with in-editor AI for generation and fixes
Qodo (formerly Codium) Excels At
- Automated unit and integration test generation with intelligent edge case detection
- Code behavior analysis and documentation for improving code quality and maintainability
- Pull request analysis with AI-powered suggestions for test coverage improvements
Performance & Integration
| Category | Windsurf | Qodo (formerly Codium) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| IDE Support | Multiple IDEs supported | Qodo provides official extensions for VS Code and the entire suite of JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ, PyCharm, etc.). | Tie |
| Community | Limited community | Active community | Tie |
| Data Richness | Basic | Comprehensive | Qodo (formerly Codium) |
| Overall Score | 91/100 | 82/100 | Windsurf |
The Bottom Line
Both Windsurf and Qodo (formerly Codium) are capable AI coding tools, but they serve different needs. Windsurf scores higher (91/100 vs 82/100) and excels in ai-native development and large codebases. The choice depends on your specific workflow, team size, and technical requirements.
Choose Windsurf if: you prioritize ai-native development and large codebases and want the higher-rated option (91/100).
Choose Qodo (formerly Codium) if: you prioritize test generation and code quality and don't mind a slightly lower score for specialized features.